Pioneer Spirit

CS3 — Mastering Lab Color: Review">Photoshop CS3 — Mastering Lab Color: Review

I expect that you may have been won­dering what I’ve been up to, over the last few weeks…

Well, the truth is that now that the exhib­i­tions have been taken down I have got a little more time for one of the aspects of my job that I enjoy the most—learning!

I am pre­dom­in­antly a visual learner, and as such, I have found the explo­sion of online training on the internet over these past few years, incred­ibly helpful. If you have kept any sort of an eye on this field, then it seems as though there are new training pro­viders coming online con­stantly. So, how do you know what to watch?

For the past 5 years, I have sub­scribed to the Lynda.com online training lib­rary (amongst many other pro­viders). They have always pro­duced great con­tent, and some of their instructors are the very best in their respective fields. One of my favourite instructors is Deke McCle­l­land. Why? Ima­gine Eddie Izzard teaching you Pho­toshop. Got it? Well, he’s like that! Deke is also the most thor­ough tutor that I have ever seen. Inter­ested in learning about making selec­tions with Pho­toshop? Deke recorded a 33 hour training series that might help! Actions and auto­ma­tion more your thing? Set aside 18 hours—you will have it coming out of your eyeballs…

So, I am trying to catch up on some training videos now that term has wound down, and this week Deke has released a new training series cov­ering the Lab Color mode within Pho­toshop. You should have seen my face!

Lab (or CIE L*a*b* D50 to be geeky) is one of the more obscure fea­tures within Pho­toshop. You could spend years using the applic­a­tion and never use it. If you have ever selected it, out of curi­osity, then you might have been hard–pressed to explain what it did, unless you did a bit of dig­ging around. You see, Lab is a colour space, i.e., a mech­anism through which Pho­toshop can numer­ic­ally describe the col­ours present in your doc­u­ment. Sounds cool huh? No? How about if I told you that you can use Lab to create col­ours that could not pos­sibly exist? Ima­gine a highly sat­ur­ated yellow… Got it? Now ima­gine the same colour, but com­pletely black… Now, this colour that you are thinking about, it not black. It is as dark as black, but it is still as vibrant as it was before we turned the lights out. Can you still pic­ture it?

As far as Deke’s training titles for Lynda.com go, this series is incred­ibly short—6.5 hours. Deke explains that this is due to the effi­ciency of the colour space. But, truth­fully, an awful lot goes unex­plained, which is very frus­trating. You see, the great cham­pion of Lab Color is an author/instructor called Dan Mar­gulis. Dan is an extraordinary author (we have some of his books in the Insti­tute library—you should read them), and he has written a great book about Lab. As much as I like Deke, Dan is the fore­most expert in the field, and Dan has also recorded an online training series (for Kel­byTraining) about Lab color. So, any review of Deke’s Mas­tering Lab Color, has to deal with Deke’s series in rela­tion to both Dan Mar­gulis’ book, and online training. Against any opponent other than Dan…

I don’t like to see Deke in a bad light—I have enjoyed all of his other titles so much, and things start well. As I have men­tioned, Lab Color is a little obscure, and it is dif­fi­cult to get your head around ini­tially. A colour model that can create ima­ginary col­ours, by defin­i­tion is going to be unlike any­thing that you are familiar with. Deke is a great explainer of tech­nical con­cepts, and his explan­a­tion of the Lab channel struc­ture is far easier to grasp than Dan Mar­gulis’ explanations—or any that I have found else­where. Every concept that I have struggled with in the past is far easier to digest here, than in any of my pre­vious encoun­ters. At this point, I am still in a slightly euphoric state, and looking for­ward to the rest of the exercises…

The next two chapters are great too. Chapter 2 dis­cusses when the Lab Color mode is an appro­priate choice. This is an important concept to be com­fort­able with, because Lab is poten­tially toxic to your images. Knowing when to take advantage of it is a little like making sure that you know which of your friends have nut aller­gies. Lab’s strengths are well explored, and Deke’s explan­a­tions offer a good coun­ter­point to the inform­a­tion in Dan’s book. Ideally you would take in both. If you are an either/or kind of person, you will be more sat­is­fied by what Dan has got to tell you.

Chapter 3 is the high­light of this title, with Deke walking through a non–destructive Lab work­flow. In Dan’s online training titles, he alludes to this, but does not demon­strate it. If your cur­rent work­flow is non–destructive, you will obvi­ously not be keen on incor­por­ating any destructive pro­cesses into it, and Deke demon­strates some fant­astic tech­niques that you will want to incor­porate into your work­flow imme­di­ately. Curi­ously though, there are two methods for con­verting your document’s colour mode into Lab, and Deke only dis­cusses the destructive pro­cess. I am sure that he must know about the other method, and I am a bit con­fused that he did not men­tion it (have a read of Dan’s book to dis­cover the other method).

From here on out though, the title moves into colour cor­rec­tion tech­niques, and—with the excep­tion of the dis­cus­sion of the Shadow/Highlight command—falls off the pro­ver­bial cliff. The Levels com­mand is given far more atten­tion than is sane, and the Curves com­mand (the king of colour cor­rec­tion) is explained more poorly than I would have ever given Deke credit for. Watching Deke give such impre­cise and con­fusing instruc­tion hurt in the same way that the last Radi­o­head album did. It’s hor­rible to have your expect­a­tions crushed like that…

In con­clu­sion then, this title—in places—is a fant­astic coun­ter­point to Dan Mar­gulis’ Lab book, and online training for Kel­byTraining. The tech­nical aspects of the col­ourspace are bril­liantly explained, and I feel that my know­ledge of the struc­ture of Lab has been much improved. Import­antly, I now feel much better equipped to teach other people how to take advantage of the fea­ture. How­ever, it is an incom­plete series, and if it is your only source of inform­a­tion, your images will not ful­fill their poten­tial. Everything else that Deke has developed for Lynda.com is fant­astic, and in places this is too. But remember to enjoy this series as part of a bal­anced diet.

Lee.


This post is tagged

  • Hi Matt,

    Thanks for your input. It is always good to hear from a fellow Deke-fan!

    I agree with you that the first few chapters of Deke's title explain the whole concept of LAB fantastically well. I think that one of the reasons that I enjoy Deke as a presenter is because of his thoroughness. As somebody who personally teaches Photoshop myself, I am totally aware that, for many people interacting with the program, surface knowledge is all that they require—and are interested in. I do not mean this disparagingly at all, but it leaves me cold.

    I am one of those people who like to know the 'why', as well as the 'how'. I believe that the more thoroughly you understand Photoshop, the more empowered you will be as a user. Often that means that you are spending your time learning aspects of the application for which you have no immediate use—or, you learn things in greater depth than appears necessary.

    I agree that there is much to learn from 'Mastering Lab Color'—but I feel compelled to make it known that this training series is no more than a drop in the ocean of this subject (not what I have come to expect, and value so much, in Deke's training titles).

    Dan Margulis' books are not famed as being 'easy' reads. The author himself acknowledges this—within the text of the books. In the case of his Lab book, to which you refer, chapters are (for the first half of the book) split into two parts—the first half of each chapter describes the 'how', and is all that you need to read to pick up the techniques described; the second half of each chapter details the 'why'. These technical details are deliberately, and clearly, separate from the more accessible information, so on Dan's behalf, I have to take issue with your assertion that this book is poorly organised. On the contrary, I believe that it is organised perfectly to aid comprehension.

    That said, I think that you will find Dan's Lab book far easier to get to grips with, after watching Deke's videos.

    In terms of 'authors' voice', I really enjoy Dan's style. I appreciate the way that he illuminates discussions of a particular topic with literary quotes, studies of visual perception, etc. I am sure that for those who like to 'cut to the chase' it might be a little irritating, but for me, it elevates Margulis into a league entirely beyond all other technical writers. Whilst the use of metaphor, in the illustration of a concept, may not be to everyone's taste, as a Photoshop instructor, I know that some people respond really well to that approach... On the other hand, Deke McClelland makes me laugh out loud during all of his training titles! When people look over my shoulder to see what I am doing, I guess that they must think that I am a little Deke's Sharpening series almost made me topple out of my chair...

    I do hope that Deke extends the Lab videos over time. At the least, I would say that his explainations of the 'Curves' tool was quite frankly inept, and is in desperate need of revision.

    I will be adding further reviews during the summer, and as always, wholeheartedly welcome everyones' opinions. I really want to do all I can to help this site develop into a really useful resource for all those learning Photoshop, so do let me know if you have any suggestions.

    Kind regards,
    Lee.
  • Matt
    Hey Lee,

    Nice review, I agree with a lot of the things you wrote, but I've also goa few thoughts to throw in too.

    First of all, I think you're spot on with your summary of deke, I've watched a lot of training videos by various authors, and read a lot of books, and never have I come across anybody as capable of delivering accurate information in such a well structured, interesting but entertaining manner. Deke is quite simply the best teacher I have ever come across, and his series on lynda.com are testament to that. I mean, as you say, 33 hours on Photoshop Channels and Masks is the most comprehensive training I've ever seen and easily the most worthwhile day and a half of my photoshop life.

    I was also over the moon when I logged onto lynda.com a few weeks back and saw the release of Mastering Lab Color by Deke McClelland, and you say, I was just as surprised by the 6 hour series length - very short for Deke.

    I must say though, I was once again really impressed by Deke's ability to make something like Lab sound so understandable, which leads me to Dan Margulis’ Lab book. I read the book about 6 months ago, and whilst I must say that it was altogether informative (considering that I knew nothing about Lab before I started reading) I was saddened by how poorly the book was written and organised. Dan, in my opinion, seems to stray from his subject too often, usually confusing and frustrating the reader. Although I haven't watched his video series, I caught up with the intro (a free movie on Kelby Training) and I had to fast forward it because he starting using unrelated topics and confusing examples. Don't get me wrong, I agree that there's some great information inside the book, but it was spread out too much by his poetic sidespeak and confusing banter.

    Maybe I'm being too harsh on Dan, but that's the way I felt when watching the videos and reading the books. I think you're right about Deke's series not being as complete as it usually is, but you remember his first incarnation of Channels & Masks? It was about 12 hours long. He updated it and not it's 33 hours. Hopefully he'll make us both happy and do the same thing with Mastering Lab Color!

    In the meantime, great series Deke, keep up the good work!

    See Yaaa!
  • I spent a few minutes a couple of days ago trying to work out how many hours of video on Lynda.com I would like to watch over the summer. Shockingly, it turned out to be about 110 hours—pity my poor eyeballs!

    Other than pouring increasingly large quantities of Optrex® into my eyes, I aim to review most of the videos I watch. I will be adding these reviews to this site throughout the summer, so keep checking in...

    As you might have noticed, a few publishers have generously agreed to sponsor the group, and they have been sending me some great books that I will also be reviewing over the summer. Once I have read them, they will all be available to you all —I am aiming to create a library service for group members. Next term promises to be a really exciting one for the group, and I am looking forward to seeing you all again.

    Take care,
    Lee.
blog comments powered by Disqus